nightingale s Environmental Theory versus Henderson s 14 constitutional NeedsIntroductionThe theories of nightingale and Henderson have both utilised the fields of environs and prefatory unavoidably in to explain the completes of health and wellness . The absolute theories , in their marrow concepts have evidently considered quaternity link factors as keys in obtaining health (1 ) soundbox (2 ) touchs (3 ) indispensable selection , and (4 ) balance . The surmisal of Nightingale has center in utilizing the surround in to provide the needs of the body in to facilitate its balance and eventually its endurance . With the similar theoretic pattern Henderson has also proposed her opening on 14 essential needs in to direct the process of achieving health by dint of the utilization of surroundingsal components to fac ilitate the balance of bodily physiology which wherefore leads to its option . that , one of the theories possesses largely broad result concepts that implicate change theoretical implicationsNightingale s Environmental TheoryAs far as the theoretical principle is concerned , Nightingale s environsal theory (1869 ) emphasizes the use of five environsal components in achieving health , viz. (1 ) consummate(a) and fresh air (2 ) pure water (3 ) expeditious drainage (4 ) cleanliness , and (5 ) appropriate lighting (McEwen and Wills , 2006.133 . These environmental components limitedally sabotage the importance of these organic needs in directing the body towards a health state . The theory of Nightingale broadly speaking defines the utilization of environment in attaining balance and health , and facilitating survival . In fact , the spirit concepts of Nightingale raise choke the contributions of environment to these five componentsHenderson s 14 Fundamental NeedsMea nwhile , the theory of Virginia Henderson s ! 14 Fundamental Needs (1966 ) has spread out its core components to variety of possible environmental influences . Aside from the potency physiological influences of environment to health (e .g .

breathing , eating and intoxication , etc Henderson has further expanded her core concepts exploring both external ( material surrounding environment ) and internal environments (body which further specify the family amid body and the utilization of environment directed towards health (Craven and Hirnle , 2005.63 Henderson s fundamental needs have focused on both tangible (e .g breathing normally ) and accessible (e .g . participation in divers(a) forms of recreation ) environmental compon ents , and utilized these core concepts to explain the relationship between health and environmentComparisonThe two core concepts of Nightingale and Henderson both utilize the principles of using environment to establish balance in body directed to its survival , which overall defines the classical depend on health However , the core concept in Nightingale s environment has been establish solely on environment through her five components . The components of environment can further weapon out to diversified compositions (e .g physical and non-physical environment . Meanwhile , in the theory of Henderson , the 14 Fundamental Needs are derived from specific relationships existing between environment and body directed in achieving health . Unlike Nightingale , Henderson has incorporated both physical and non-physical or social environment and further links these components to make better explain the subject of the theory , which is the ideal basic needs of...If you want to get a ful l essay, order it on our website:
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment